BOOK CASE

 

Everything in a lawful court is based on evidence.

That's what judges and jury's make their decisions on.

When those on trial step into court, they first have to swear on the bible to confirm they are telling the truth.

The bible represents the word of god, but could a court provide evidence that god exists other than presenting a book written by scribes which has been tampered with over the centuries?

For example, if a document was presented as evidence at a trial, but it was proven to have been tampered with, it would lead to the document being dismissed.

It could be argued that court case procedures are a non-starter in the first place because of this historical bible tampering.

GG