It's curious how people often assume that when someone dupes another person, they must be cleverer and superior to the person who has been duped.
I view the situation in the exact opposite way.
If someone has to resort to duping a person, it means they don't have the capacity to communicate correctly.
Deception isn't communication, therefor it's an interactive self defeat.
When a person inadvertantly makes a wrong choice as a consequence of not knowing they are being duped, that isn't confirmation of inferiority.
If people can't communicate using facts, then they are the ones who are dim and inferior.
GG
No comments:
Post a Comment