I often get the impression that when an "official investigation" is started, relating to some suspicious wrong-doing involving a prominent political figure or authoritative organisation, those who are chosen to do the investigating, are in on it.
It's as if they decide in advance to make it seem like the suspects are being investigated for the media's sake, but a prior agreement is made to have the result turn out to be "inconclusive" and no further action is required.
The supposed investigation is nothing other than a pre-planned public relations exercise where they pad out zilch for a couple of weeks before they finally state they couldn't find any conclusive proof of wrong-doing.
There's no going from A to B or following trails or even any investigating involved.
It's the equivalent of rocking back and forward on a rocking horse.
It's as if they decide in advance to make it seem like the suspects are being investigated for the media's sake, but a prior agreement is made to have the result turn out to be "inconclusive" and no further action is required.
The supposed investigation is nothing other than a pre-planned public relations exercise where they pad out zilch for a couple of weeks before they finally state they couldn't find any conclusive proof of wrong-doing.
There's no going from A to B or following trails or even any investigating involved.
It's the equivalent of rocking back and forward on a rocking horse.
GG
No comments:
Post a Comment